The transcript and quotations remain in Spanish, the original language of the session. The report and interface are translated. Read the Spanish version →
← back

demo · real report

see how nexmin reads a clinical session.

A real session report. Identifying names and locations have been anonymized. Explore the full transcript, hypotheses, quotations and metrics as they appear in the nexmin analysis.

01 · the session

a first interview, with its full analysis.

Participants appear as Therapist and Client. We preserve the clinical content of the report; only identifying names and locations are replaced, and references to its provenance are removed.

duration
95 minutes
therapist
Therapist
lens
Transdiagnostic
format
First interview

02 · how to read this

What nexmin does when you upload audio.

nexmin returns several layers that are saved as drafts. The therapist can approve, discard or edit them before incorporating them into the approved clinical record. Each block below is one of these layers.

  1. 01

    Narrative synthesis (Scriba)

    A prose account of what happened in the session: it describes, without diagnosing. The wording follows the selected lens — transdiagnostic in this demo — and can incorporate the therapist's own instructions. On approval, a shorter summary helps you return to the case at a glance.

  2. 02

    Working hypotheses (current session)

    While the synthesis describes, this block formulates: each hypothesis uses tentative language, with its textual evidence and ways to test it in future sessions. Risk assessment lives here. A draft the therapist approves, refines or discards.

  3. 03

    Process reading (Pensa)

    While Scriba describes and the hypotheses formulate, Pensa reads the process: what changes, what remains, what emerges and the status of the declared hypotheses. With just one session, it provides a baseline and markers to follow.

  4. 04

    Cartographer · five variables

    Scores from 0–100 across five dimensions (agency, flexibility, emotional processing, alliance and participation), with supporting quotations from the analysis. The first session establishes the baseline for following the process over time.

  5. 05

    Audio phenotype

    A two-pass acoustic reading: first it estimates voice parameters (activation, variability, stress, pace and silences), then it expresses them in clinical language. It flags possible incongruities between tone and content, with timestamps.

  6. 06

    Structured data

    For a first session, it also extracts: presenting concern, history, beliefs, fears, strengths and life timeline.

  7. 07

    Patient memory

    The patient's memory, updated after each approved session: recurring themes, patterns, goals and risk.

In the application, these layers are generated from the session audio and saved as drafts pending review. They become approved clinical content only after the therapist's explicit approval: distinguishing observation from interpretation remains the professional's responsibility.

03 · narrative synthesis

Fear of having an episode and making a fool of myself

The first thing the therapist sees on opening the session: a narrative account written by Scriba, with references to what happened in the session. It writes what is present — describing, without diagnosing — through the selected lens (here, transdiagnostic). The draft is saved for review and becomes approved content when the therapist approves it.

The client (34 years old) attends a single interview in which she presents her historical psychosomatic condition as the reason for consultation, characterised by acute episodes of vomiting, gastric pain and immobilisation in bed. Regarding its temporal status, the client specifies that the main somatic symptom is in remission: «llevo cinco años sin ninguna crisis», with the last episode occurring during the handover of the family business in 2018. At present, what she describes as active and limiting is the anticipatory fear of relapse («a volverme a quedar en la cama»), the experience of being blocked from actively seeking employment and the difficulty of setting boundaries in her everyday interpersonal relationships.

Regarding her biographical and background history, she reports that the emetic episodes began around the age of nine or ten, after her parents' separation, initially using them as a behaviour to seek maternal attention: «Yo era la que me provocaba el vómito para llamar la atención de mi madre». She describes her mother's sudden death from a stroke when she was fifteen (around 2004), a prolonged distancing from her father —who died in 2022 from pancreatic cancer, whom she cared for in his final moments and with whom she carried out a farewell ritual in [localidad]— and a relationship of distance and fear towards her middle brother. Regarding critical medical events in the past, she reports a prolonged hospital admission with an ICU stay due to a seizure caused by hyponatraemia from dehydration. She currently lives with her husband and has temporarily taken in her older sister after a divorce, positioning herself as mediator in the tension at home between them.

In the observable behavioural and affective sphere, the client cries and has tearful eyes when evoking her historical need for affection («siempre he anhelado que me quieran»), alternating with laughter when narrating situations of financial overload, family conflicts and past experiences of helplessness. She verbalises a constant pattern of putting others' needs first in order to feel useful («hago cosas por los demás que no hago por mí misma»), as well as rejecting affectionate physical contact when she is vulnerable («a mí el contacto físico no, no me gusta»).

Regarding risk history, the client reports self-harming behaviours in adolescence («cogía una cuchilla y me cortaba los brazos») and suicidal ideation during past moments of overload: «o tiras pa'lante tú o te tiras de un puente, que también lo he pensado muchas veces», verbalising thoughts such as «si yo no estoy, estos problemas no existen», which she frames as past ideas that were not acted upon.

During the session, the professional carries out interventions aimed at exploring the relational origins of her need to please, reformulates the somatic manifestations as a physical expression of unverbalised affects («el cuerpo traduce aquello que no pueden decir las palabras») and validates the internal dialogue strategies that the client has developed in previous therapeutic processes. The client participates actively, validating the observations and recognising her current learning process for expressing disagreement directly. As this is a single-session framework, no between-session tasks or continuity of treatment are established.

04 · working hypotheses

Working hypotheses — an explicit formulation.

While the synthesis describes, this block formulates explicitly: each hypothesis uses tentative language, with its textual evidence and ways to test it in future sessions. Risk assessment lives here, rather than in the description. It remains a draft for the therapist to approve, refine or discard: hypotheses declared today that the process may confirm or refute.

Working hypotheses

Early hypotheses (session 1): provisional pending clarification of the presenting concern.

H1 — Self-sacrifice and appeasement as a search for validation and relational protection
  • Tentative statement: It is worth exploring whether the continuing tendency to put others' needs first and take on overload functions as a learned strategy to secure affection, avoid rejection and compensate for a deep experience of low personal worth.
  • Observable evidence: The client expresses the following about her current relational pattern: «En el fondo me importa porque mi día a día lo baso en, en hacer feliz a los demás y nunca me preocupo de hacerme feliz a mí misma» [00:25:55] and «hago cosas por los demás que no hago por mí misma. Mmm, entonces, claro, mmm, yo intento compensar mis carencias con eso» [00:06:26]. She connects this with her underlying affective experience: «Yo siempre he vivido en una pena... Siempre he anhelado que me quieran. Entonces, supongo que soy así porque necesito que me quieran» [00:13:29] (current material and background biography). The causal connection between early deprivation and adult appeasement is a clinical conjecture shared in the session dialogue.
  • How to test: Explore in future sessions everyday situations in which the client tries to set direct boundaries or refuse external requests (both within cohabitation and at work), observing the degree of distress, guilt or fear of losing the bond that becomes activated when she prioritises her own wishes.
H2 — Gastric somatisation as a route for discharge in response to unexpressed relational conflicts
  • Tentative statement: The emetic episodes and gastric pain may historically have operated —and persist as an anticipatory threat— as a bodily route for expressing emotional suffering in the face of family dynamics experienced as intolerable or unassimilable.
  • Observable evidence: Regarding the underlying origin, she reports: «Yo era la que me provocaba el vómito para llamar la atención de mi madre» [00:12:32] (background biography). Regarding how it operated in past crises: «"Mi psicosomatía va en relación a mi familia". Y también va en relación a que yo no, no... He querido ser lo que no soy. O sea, viene mi hermana: "[nombre], ¿qué te parece que traspasemos el estanco, tal, no sé qué?" Por dentro, pf. Por fuera: "No pasa nada, Tata, si es lo que tú necesitas para estar bien, pues todo es bien". ¿Qué me pasa? Vomito» [00:47:23] (material referring to the last crisis in 2018). Regarding the present: «chicos, si esto sigue así, yo vomito. Por favor, hay que arreglar esto porque yo no quiero acabar en la cama. Y si esta situación sigue aquí, yo me doy cuenta porque tengo dolores de estómago, porque ya empiezo con la descomposición» [01:18:43] (current material).
  • How to test: Assess whether assertiveness training and the direct, timely verbal expression of anger or disagreement reduce the appearance of precursor somatic signals (gastric pain, nausea, dorsal rigidity).
H3 — Fear of somatic relapse as a brake on autonomy and labour-market entry
  • Tentative statement: It may be that anticipatory fear of suffering a new disabling crisis is acting as a maintaining factor for behavioural blockage, justifying the postponement of an active job search and maintaining a position of functional dependence.
  • Observable evidence: The client verbalises in the present: «para mí es algo que me paraliza la vida, porque tengo tanto miedo a que me dé la crisis, que no soy capaz de avanzar en mi vida» [00:01:38] and «sé que tengo que salir a buscar trabajo, pero me da tanto miedo salir a buscar trabajo que prefiero aguantar malas caras y malos comentarios» [00:06:17], despite the major somatic condition being in remission: «gracias a Dios, llevo cinco años sin ninguna crisis» [00:04:36] (current material from the session).
  • How to test: Propose graded behavioural experiments aimed at job searching or going outside the safe home environment, monitoring whether avoidance responds purely to anticipatory somatic fear or whether anxieties linked to social evaluation and performance emerge.
H4 — Mediation in other people's conflicts as an attempt to preserve the core of safety
  • Tentative statement: The data are compatible with the possibility that the client takes on an active mediating role between her husband and her sister to avoid a new rupture in her limited relational system, at the cost of a significant increase in her own distress.
  • Observable evidence: Regarding the current cohabitation, she says: «como no quiero que me vuelva a pasar lo mismo, intento mediar. Pero, ¿qué me pasa? Que cuando medio Me explota en la cara» [00:25:55], grounding the need to hold both together in: «es que me queda tan poca familia que me gustaría tanto que la poca familia que me queda se llevara bien» [00:31:37] and «Si mañana me atropellara un camión y me quedara tetrapléjica, los únicos que me cuidarían serían mi hermana y mi marido. Son las únicas personas con las que yo cuento...» [00:31:52] (current material from the session).
  • How to test: Record what happens when the client refrains from intervening in direct friction between her sister and her husband, observing whether she can tolerate interpersonal tension without assuming responsibility for restoring calm.
H5 — Ambivalence in the marital dyad between secure protection and a brake on autonomous growth
  • Tentative statement: It may be proposed that her bond with her husband functions simultaneously as an indispensable space of stability and containment in the face of historical deprivation and as a complementary dynamic that perpetuates the perception of personal fragility and incompetence.
  • Observable evidence: The client states: «Nos complementamos y nos perjudicamos, porque yo me doy cuenta muchas veces de que me necesita, pero también le jodo. Y yo lo necesito, pero también-- o sea, si yo no tuviera ese apoyo, si yo no tuviera esa seguridad que me da él, igual no me quedarían más cojones que salir al mundo» [01:29:45], adding regarding the division of roles: «Él va con-- empujando un carro y yo voy detrás intentando que no tenga ninguna piedra en el camino [...] pero sí, yo voy detrás porque no, no, no sé ir delante» [00:41:03] (current material).
  • How to test: In successive sessions, enquire into the client's independent decision-making initiatives inside and outside the home, assessing how the couple dynamic responds to changes towards greater parity and autonomy.

Threads flagged by the Monitor, not formulated:

  • [agency · [01:22:39]]: Notes the client's recent learning to confront and express verbal disagreements forcefully; it is not formulated as an independent hypothesis because it is integrated as a resource in contrast within H2.
  • [emotional processing · [01:00:36]]: Describes the elaborative integration of maternal grief following an epistolary and imaginal ritual; no hypothesis is formulated because the account presents it as a closed and overcome process.
  • [alliance · [00:40:00]]: Expresses the experience of helplessness in the face of life events; it is not formulated because it is addressed transversally in the hypotheses of self-sacrifice and autonomy (H1 and H3).
  • [alliance · [00:06:55]]: Records the initial doubt before the interview and the value of the commitment to attend; no hypothesis is formulated because it corresponds to adherence to the single-session framework.

Risk assessment
  • Overall assessment: Current risk low, with significant historical antecedents of self-harming behaviour and recurrent passive suicidal ideation.
  • Justification:
    • Self-harm risk (historical — reported as past during adolescence): The client reports episodes of cutting her arms during the school years between ages 10 and 13: «En todo este tiempo yo me autolesionaba, cogía una cuchilla y me cortaba los brazos» [00:21:09], describing it as a past strategy for affect self-regulation.
    • Suicidal ideation (recurrent — verbalised in this session, with no time frame specified by the client): She verbalises thoughts of escape and existential cessation in response to situations of overload: «o tiras pa'lante tú o te tiras de un puente, que también lo he pensado muchas veces, ¿eh? No te creas» [01:32:55], adding «si yo no estoy, estos problemas no existen» [01:33:02]. These thoughts are framed as reactive ideas that were neither planned nor active in the present moment.
    • Risk towards third parties: No ideation or risk behaviour towards third parties is identified in the material explored. The assessed risk concerns the client herself exclusively.
  • Protective factors: Good capacity for affective bonding, a close support network made up of her husband and sister, awareness of her somatisation patterns, introspective capacity and a history of seeking professional help.
  • Elements to monitor: If an ongoing psychotherapy process begins, monitoring the reactivation of thoughts of death or experiences of worthlessness in response to possible escalations of family conflict or prolonged overload is recommended, agreeing explicit spaces to verbalise emotional collapse before resorting to hopelessness.

Assessment based solely on the material from this session; without access to prior history or subsequent development.


Suggested lines of work
  1. Training in assertive communication and boundary-setting: Encourage the direct expression of needs, disagreements and unpleasant emotions (especially anger and sadness) in her close environment, reducing the tendency towards appeasing mediation.
  2. Review and re-signification of bodily signals: Work on differentiating emotional activation from the threat of a serious organic crisis, dismantling the cycle of anticipatory fear of somatisation through somatic and emotional self-regulation techniques.
  3. Gradual activation oriented towards personal and occupational autonomy: Establish small behavioural steps towards seeking occupational activity and functional independence, analysing and tolerating the distress prompted by the possibility of making mistakes or facing external judgement.
  4. Restructuring beliefs about personal worth and usefulness: Question the implicit premise that affection and personal worth depend exclusively on performance, helpfulness or unconditional care for others.

05 · process reading

Pensa — reading the process.

While Scriba describes and the hypotheses formulate, Pensa reads the process: it places the session in time — what changes, what remains, what emerges and where the declared hypotheses stand. With a single session on record, it does not simulate a progression that does not yet exist: Pensa establishes the baseline and marks the indicators to follow. A reading draft for the therapist to accept, refine or discard.

Baseline

This block tracks clinical development across sessions and will acquire its comparative dimension as the history expands; the current session sets the initial baseline.

Markers to follow
  1. Pattern of appeasement and relational overload (contrasts H1) Current state: Expresses an active tendency to subordinate her own needs («hago cosas por los demás que no hago por mí misma») as a mechanism aimed at securing the affective bond and avoiding experiences of rejection.
  2. Gastric somatisation and anticipation of crises (contrasts H2) Current state: The major somatic condition (severe vomiting and immobilisation) has remained in remission for five years; nevertheless, prodromal bodily signals (stomach aches, digestive upset) persist in situations of active family tension.
  3. Behavioural blockage and occupational autonomy (contrasts H3) Current state: Avoidance of active job searching attributed to anticipatory fear of suffering a disabling episode outside the home environment («tengo tanto miedo a que me dé la crisis, que no soy capaz de avanzar»).
  4. Family containment and mediation role (contrasts H4) Current state: Takes responsibility for regulating cohabitation friction between her sister and her husband to protect the stability of her immediate support network («como no quiero que me vuelva a pasar lo mismo, intento mediar»).
  5. Dependency and marital safety dynamic (contrasts H5) Current state: Explicit recognition of an ambivalent experience with her partner («nos complementamos y nos perjudicamos»), in which the affective containment received coexists with difficulties in assuming a position of functional autonomy.

References: 20/11/2023

06 · process variables

Cartographer — the quantitative reading.

Measuring a therapeutic process with five numbers may seem ambitious — these five variables are a first version, not a truth. Their value lies in the time series: how agency evolves (whether the client experiences herself as an actor or an observer), reflective flexibility (nuance versus all-or-nothing thinking), emotional processing (what she does with what she feels, not whether it is pleasant), alliance (the relationship and agreement on goals and tasks) and active participation. Each score comes with supporting quotations; the first session sets the baseline. Scores are computational estimates, never infallible facts: the therapist validates or corrects them.

agencymiddle band
50/ 100

The capacity to act and make decisions from one's own position, rather than as an automatic response to the environment.

Weighted estimate across ~14 moments of the session; the most illustrative are cited. The client oscillates evenly between the experience of blockage and helplessness in the face of her somatic symptoms and incipient steps towards self-assertion and boundary-setting. She does not reach a higher level because the feeling of being at the mercy of fear and family relational dynamics still predominates.

«A causa de, mmm, toda la historia que yo tengo detrás, que ni es sencilla ni es fácil, y que es la que me ha tocado vivir. Y seguro que hay gente que está peor que yo o que ha pasado infancias peores, pero yo no lo he sabido llevar mejor. Yo, yo todo por a-- [chasquido de lengua] no sé, aparte recuerdo, ¿no? Cuando mis padres se divorciaron, yo empecé a crearme esto. Y a-- estuve mucho tiempo sin ir al colegio y cuando volví al colegio, todo el mundo de mi clase se había puesto en mi contra, porque había una que le caí-- lo típico de los niños, te estoy hablando que íbamos a quinto, sexto de primaria. Una niña que le caía mal puso a toda la clase en mi contra. Entonces, claro, cuando yo llegué al colegio, em, todavía peor, porque mis amigos ya no estaban. O sea, todo el mundo me había dado la espalda. No quería estar en casa, no quería estar en el colegio, lo único que hacía era provocarme crisis, vómitos. Bueno, yo me he llegado a autolesionar. En todo este tiempo yo me autolesionaba, cogía una cuchilla y me cortaba los brazos.»
[00:21:09]Shows the experience of helplessness and paralysis conditioned by the prior history of relational deprivation.
«Te lo tengo que decir petiqui petí. O sea, me da igual. Yo lo digo y si de esto, pues ya asumiremos las consecuencias. Pero yo tengo que decir esto. Yo a, sobre todo mi hermana o, o mi marido, ¿no? Yo les he dicho auténticas burradas en el-- pero porque necesitaba sacarlo, ¿no? O sea, yo todo esto de que cuando estaba mala y ellos estaban en el comedor, yo los estaba oyendo, mmm, necesitaba decírselo-»
[01:22:39]Illustrates moments of emerging agency in which she actively decides to express her distress and assume the consequences.
flexibilitymiddle band
60/ 100

Openness to reframing meanings, tolerating ambiguity and revisiting one's own narratives.

Weighted estimate across ~12 moments of the session; the most illustrative are cited. The client shows a notable reflective capacity and self-analysis when examining her own trajectory, identifying nuances in her emotional bonds. However, she maintains rigid premises about her own capacity ('no soy capaz', 'el miedo me retiene') and her appeasing role.

«Nos complementamos y nos perjudicamos, porque yo me doy cuenta muchas veces de que me necesita, pero también le jodo. Y yo lo necesito, pero también-- o sea, si yo no tuviera ese apoyo, si yo no tuviera esa seguridad que me da él, igual no me quedarían más cojones que salir al mundo»
[01:29:45]Reflects the capacity to hold ambivalence and observe contradictory nuances in the couple relationship.
«Porque al final es un poco lo que me ha pasado siempre, ¿no? Yo siempre digo: [chasquido de lengua] "Mi psicosomatía va en relación a mi familia". Y también va en relación a que yo no, no... He querido ser lo que no soy. O sea, viene mi hermana: "[nombre], ¿qué te parece que traspasemos el estanco, tal, no sé qué?" Por dentro, pf. Por fuera: "No pasa nada, Tata, si es lo que tú necesitas para estar bien, pues todo es bien". ¿Qué me pasa? Vomito. Mmm, no, pues, yo qué sé. Se muere mi madre, ¿no? Pues hay que seguir palante, hay que tirar palante. No, yo tiro palante, yo tiro palante, yo tiro palante. No, tiras palante sin camino. Tiras palante sin camino y al final te caes, que fue lo que me pasó a mí. Yo intenté ser quien no era. Y en vez de decir: "No, no, yo estoy hundida en la miseria, yo quiero mi mamita, yo me muero", y estar unos meses muriéndome para salir bien, yo quise salir a lo precipitado. Pues así vamos, así voy, vamos, ¿no? [ríe]»
[00:47:23]Shows reflective self-observation of the psychosomatic origin of her symptoms and the cost of appeasement.
emotional processingmiddle band
55/ 100

Access to, integration of and tolerance for emotion without dysregulation.

Weighted estimate across ~15 moments of the session; the most illustrative are cited. She makes fluid contact with experiences of pain, loneliness and anger, naming and symbolising them through clear biographical accounts. She does not reach a higher range because she resorts to gastric somatisation as a route for bodily discharge and is still in the process of metabolising early grief.

«Supongo que sí. Supongo que sí, porque yo me, me anulo en, en pena. Y solo lloro. Yo cuando estoy en crisis, solo lloro y duermo, lloro y duermo, lloro y duermo. No hago nada más. Y vomito. Lloro, duermo y vomito. Lloro, duermo y vomito. Y no hago nada más. Yo siempre he vivido en una pena... Siempre he anhelado que me quieran. Entonces, supongo que soy así porque necesito que me quieran.»
[00:13:29]Articulates and names the emotional pain underlying her episodes of physical somatisation.
«Mi psicóloga me decía, dice: «Lo que tú has tenido en el sueño es como una reafirmación, donde todo el mundo te decía: "Ella está muerta", tú te reafirmabas diciendo: "No, no, ella está..."», o sea: «Ella está viva». Yo me reafirmaba diciendo: «No, no, ella está muerta». Y eso de alguna manera fue como una aceptación de mi cerebro de decir-- porque yo siempre tenía la esperanza. Yo pasaba por delante del estanco y, y siempre esperaba ver a mi madre dentro. Y a raíz de ese sueño, a raíz de esa carta, a raíz de eso Como que yo ya acepté que, que es una mierda, que no está aquí, pero no está. No puedes hacer nada. No, no va a venir. Por mucho que tú vomites, por mucho que tú patalees, por mucho que tú te autodestruyas, tu madre no va a venir. Y tu padre tampoco, porque no está en juego. Y ya te digo, yo mi padre murió y bueno, yo para mí fue más un quedar en paz con, conmigo misma, que fui-- porque aparte él era [procedencia]. Entonces, él su último deseo fue que nosotros, eh, lo incineráramos y fuéramos a [localidad] y tiráramos sus cenizas en el [parque], en el [monte], porque ahí habían tirado a su hermano y tal y no sé qué. Y, y bueno, yo lo hice todo. Yo lo hice, bueno, lo hicimos todo. Fuimos a [localidad], tiramos las cenizas, todo, todo el esto, y yo para mí fue como que con mi padre he quedado en paz. O sea, yo las peleas que tengo con mi padre siempre las he tenido, toda la vida, desde que tenía diez años y me dejaban encerrada en el local. Toda la vida. Y toda la-- lo bueno que yo sí he tenido con mi padre es que yo a mi padre le he tirado mucha mierda a la cara. A la hora de-- [chasquido de lengua] no me ha servido para nada, porque a él por aquí le ha entrado y por aquí le ha salido. Pero en vida yo le he tirado toda esta mierda a la cara. Entonces, supongo que muerto ya no me hace falta tirársela, porque ya sé que no tiene arreglo. Ya sé que aunque, mmm, ¿sabes? Su respuesta va a ser: «Ay, hija, ¿y qué quieres que haga?».»
[01:00:36]Describes a process of assimilating and integrating grief and the loss of parental figures.
alliancehigh band
75/ 100

The quality of the therapeutic relationship observable in the session: trust, cooperation and contact.

Weighted estimate across ~10 moments of the session; the most illustrative are cited. Although this is a single interview, the client establishes a bond (Bond) of deep trust and warmth, sharing highly vulnerable experiences from the outset. Agreement on the task (Task) and the exploration objectives (Goal) unfolds cooperatively and in alignment with the therapist's feedback.

Single session with no planned continuity of care.

«Porque, porque al final, [tos] la vida te lleva un poco así a... No sé, yo me siento en la vida como así, ¿no?»
[00:40:00]Engages transparently with the therapist by sharing her experience of feeling disoriented in life.
«Pero esta mañana, mmm, decía: «Para qué me meto yo en estos follones». [risas] Lo que pasa que el-»
[00:06:55]Shows openness in voicing initial doubts and genuinely connecting with the therapeutic space.
active participationhigh band
75/ 100

Engagement in the work: bringing one's own material, maintaining focus and taking the floor.

Weighted estimate across ~11 moments of the session; the most illustrative are cited. The client takes a leading role in the narrative, contributing rich autobiographical material, actively analysing her relational patterns and connecting prior reflections with the present dialogue. She remains in this range because this is a one-off session with no assessable between-session tasks.

«Sí, el miedo a, a volverme a quedar en la cama, el miedo a que me vuelva a dar una crisis. Ahora, gracias a Dios, llevo cinco años sin ninguna crisis. La última fue por el traspaso del negocio familiar. Se traspasó, es que claro, yo me he autoanalizado mucho, porque claro, no tengo dinero para pagar tanto psicólogo. [ríe] Entonces, me he autoanalizado mucho.»
[00:04:36]Provides evidence of personal initiative and sustained introspective work to understand her symptoms.
«Te lo contaré en la siguiente crisis, no sé cómo decirte, ¿no? O sea, yo, yo ya intento. O sea, yo por ejemplo, ahora cuando llegó mi hermana, uf, estuvimos, mi-- bueno, mi marido ha empezado a ir al psicólogo después de mucho [risas] tiempo, que nunca en la vida ha querido ir. O sea, tuvimos una situación en casa crítica y yo senté a mi hermana y a mi marido y lo primero que les dije fue: chicos, si esto sigue así, yo vomito. Por favor, hay que arreglar esto porque yo no quiero acabar en la cama. Y si esta situación sigue aquí, yo me doy cuenta porque tengo dolores de estómago, porque ya empiezo con la descomposición.»
[01:18:43]Details proactive actions implemented in her daily life to anticipate and manage family conflicts.

07 · voice analysis

What the voice says beyond the words.

While transcription turns speech into text, voice analysis estimates acoustic parameters: vocal activation, expressive variability, pace, vocal stress, latencies and speaking ratio. It records sound cues and flags possible incongruities between tone and content; their clinical meaning is for the therapist to assess. These cues do not establish an emotion or a diagnosis. nexmin does not store a permanent voice identifier: speaker assignment is proposed for each session, and the therapist decides which voice belongs to whom. These are computational estimates for professional review, not measurements with instrumental precision.

acoustic signals

vocal activation

0.58

Physiological activation observable in the voice (0–1)

prosodic variability

0.62

Melodic richness of speech (0–1)

speech rate

164 wpm

Words per minute

vocal stress

50/100

Sustained tension in the vocal apparatus

average latency

480 ms

Predominant silence: neutral

speaking ratio

81% / 19%

Client / therapist

intonation

normal

pauses

18%

interruptions

9

conversational flow

high

Voice and affective state

The client presents moderate vocal activation (0,58), together with expressive variability of 0,62 and a normal intonation curve, forming a dynamic prosody. Vocal stress is at a medium level of 50 out of 100, accompanied by an agile speech rate of 164 words per minute, compatible with a fluent discursive rhythm without slowing. In the management of pauses, a low pause frequency (0,18) is observed, with an average response latency of 480 ms and a neutral dominant silence type; these observable acoustic features reflect sustained verbal continuity during the session.

Exchange dynamics

The exchange was clearly dominated by the client, who maintained a speech ratio of 81 % compared with the therapist's interventions. Although 9 interruptions were recorded over the nearly 95 minutes of consultation, exchange fluency was high, describing agile turn transitions and continuous communicative interaction without perceptible blockages.

Detected incongruences

The 5 clearest incongruences out of the 18 detected in the session are shown. The following acoustic-verbal observations are noted:

Moments where the model flags a possible incongruity between content and vocal expression. Each signal includes a timestamp so the therapist can review that point in the audio.

  • [11:41] Possible incongruence between tone and content: laughter when recounting having been born as an attempt to save her parents' broken marriage.

    Acoustic detail · 11:41

    Incongruity · detector 88 % · to review

    Possible incongruence between tone and content: laughter when recounting having been born as an attempt to save her parents' broken marriage

    Laughter emitted while verbalising that she had been conceived as an attempt to save a fractured marital relationship.

  • [18:24] Possible incongruence between tone and content: a light, laughing tone when describing her father's nightly outings and substance use during her childhood.

    Acoustic detail · 18:24

    Incongruity · detector 86 % · to review

    Possible incongruence between tone and content: laughing tone when describing her father's substance use and abandonment of the family

    Light tone and laughter when describing her father's nights out and drug use during her childhood.

  • [40:57] Possible incongruence between tone and content: audible laughter when mentioning the past risk of ending up marginalised while using substances in a ditch.

    Acoustic detail · 40:57

    Incongruity · detector 89 % · to review

    Possible incongruence between tone and content: laughter when mentioning the risk of having ended up in a ditch while using substances

    Audible laughter while describing past scenarios of extreme vulnerability and substance use.

  • [66:22] Possible incongruence between tone and content: laughter when referring to the physical punishments and beatings her father inflicted on her siblings.

    Acoustic detail · 66:22

    Incongruity · detector 91 % · to review

    Possible incongruence between tone and content: laughter when recounting the beatings her father inflicted on her siblings

    Laughter emitted while recounting that her father punished her older siblings with beatings and blows from a belt.

  • [93:00] Possible incongruence between tone and content: marked laughter when verbalising past recurrent thoughts of throwing herself from a bridge.

    Acoustic detail · 93:00

    Incongruity · detector 94 % · to review

    Possible incongruence between tone and content: laughter when recounting thoughts of throwing herself from a bridge

    Marked laughter while verbalising having had recurrent thoughts of throwing herself from a bridge.

The session was characterised by acoustically fluent speech, predominantly from the client, accompanied by repeated laughter and laughing tones when verbalising biographical experiences of notable adversity.

08 · structured data

The first-session form, already filled in.

When this is a client's first session, nexmin also extracts the fields a therapist would fill in manually: presenting concern, symptoms, history, limiting beliefs, fears, traits, strengths and clinical observations. With verbatim quotations where appropriate.

basic information

Name
Client
Age
34
Marital status
Married
Year of birth
1989
Occupation
House cleaner
Place of residence
[localidad]

presenting concern

«Y bueno, mmm, para mí es algo que me paraliza la vida, porque tengo tanto miedo a que me dé la crisis, que no soy capaz de avanzar en mi vida. Porque vivo siempre con el miedo de, de que, de quedar mal.»

The consultant attends because of severe psychosomatic crises characterised by uncontrollable vomiting and physical paralysis, which she associates with family conflicts and deprivation. She has a paralysing fear of suffering new crises, which prevents her from seeking employment and moving forward with her personal autonomy.

physical symptoms

  • Severe and recurrent vomiting

    They appear as acute crises triggered by serious family events or conflicts. They prevent her from eating, drinking and getting out of bed.

  • Acute pain in the pit of the stomach

    Described as a sensation of strong tightness or pressure in the pit of the stomach during crises.

  • Minor somatisations (stomach ache, diarrhoea and cramps in the back)

    They appear as prodromal signs of nervousness in situations of active family tension.

limiting beliefs

  • «Siempre he sido como una molestia, ¿no? Como...»
  • «Siempre he sentido que le peso a la gente que tengo alrededor»
  • «No tengo seguridad en mí misma, no, no sé avanzar»
  • «Yo creo que tengo cara de tonta, la gente se aprovecha de mí un montón»
  • «Yo no puedo, yo necesito a todo el mundo»
  • «Yo no valgo para este mundo, me voy a la mierda»

fears

  • Fear of having a psychosomatic episode and making a fool of herself
  • Fear of ending up in bed again, unable to move
  • Fear of finding a job and failing because of the crises
  • Fear of going out to look for work
  • Fear of rejection, of being told no, or of saying something inappropriate
  • Fear of being harmed, contempt, abandonment and betrayal

strengths

  • Ability to self-analyse and reflect on her own history and the origin of her crises
  • A strong sense of commitment and keeping her word
  • Empathy and a natural willingness to help others
  • Ability to adapt and be versatile in the face of life's circumstances
  • Ability to solve other people's practical problems
  • Ability to express and communicate her emotional and physical boundaries to her family at present

self-identified traits

  • Psychosomatic
  • Sensory
  • Empathic
  • Potentially tearful / Very sentimental
  • Soft-hearted but spirited and fiery
  • Versatile / Able to adapt to anything
  • Prudent
  • Resourceful
  • Cowardly (in relation to suicidal thoughts)

family structure

The consultant was born into a fragmented family with a large age gap between her and her siblings.

Siblings: 3 · Living: 3 · Died in childhood: 0 · Position: the last one

Partner

She has been with her since she was 15 or 16. She has endured very difficult situations. She describes her as a saint, but also mentions that she has unconsciously engaged in psychological abuse by taking her frustration out at home. She is very argumentative, strong-willed and courageous, but she feels she relies on her and goes out of her way to make her happy to keep peace in the home.

Alive, currently living together

Older sister

They are 15 years apart. She took on a maternal role, caring for her when she was little and during her health crises. She recently divorced after a 15-year relationship and moved in with the consultant and her husband. They had been estranged for five years, during which the sister did not show concern for her.

Alive, temporarily living with the consultant

Middle brother

They are 13 years apart. Their relationship has historically been conflictual, marked by his jealousy since childhood, threats and verbal abuse («es que no vales para nada, es que no sirves»). They currently do not speak after a cohabitation conflict in which the consultant's husband and he fought.

Alive, no contact

Mother

She died suddenly of a stroke when the consultant was 15. She had no time to care for her because of her work at the family tobacconist's. After the divorce, she left the consultant living with her grandfather to go and live with her boyfriend, which created a strong feeling of abandonment and betrayal.

Deceased

Father

He died last year (2022) of pancreatic cancer. He never took on a protective or caring role; after the divorce he trafficked cocaine, left her locked up at night in uninhabitable premises or squats, and neglected her hospital admissions. He only contacted her to ask for money.

Deceased

Grandfather

The consultant lived with him when she was 12 or 13 and he was 94, after her mother went to live with her boyfriend.

Deceased

clinical history

Salud mental propia

  • Psychological treatment in childhood and adolescence with multiple professionals, without effective results due to lack of receptiveness.
  • Psychological therapy to work through grief after her mother's death (five years after the death).
  • Psychotherapy six or seven years ago helped her develop assertiveness, confront her partner's psychological abuse and learn to express her emotions.

Urgencias o intentos

  • Admission to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) for almost a month and a three-month hospital stay at [hospital] due to a cerebral epileptic crisis caused by hyponatremia (severe sodium depletion) secondary to her continuing vomiting.
  • Past self-harm (cutting her arms with a blade as a mechanism for relief and relaxation).

Familiares con antecedentes

  • She mentions that her older sister is currently going through severe depression after her divorce.

medication

  • antiepileptic · past

    Treatment after a cerebral epileptic crisis caused by low sodium

  • diazepam · past

    Anxiety or mental health crisis

referrals

Head of neurology at [hospital] (past neurological follow-up completed).

09 · life timeline

the life timeline extracted from the session.

Events, ages and quotations extracted from the session.

  1. 19890 years

    Birth

  2. 19989 years

    Separation from her siblings and her parents' divorce

    All of a sudden I get up one morning and she says to me: "Cariño, recoge lo que más te haga falta, que nos vamos a vivir a casa del abuelo". And that was my-- and it was from then on that I began to develop this illness I have now.

  3. 200112 years

    Maternal abandonment to live with her boyfriend

    Look, think about it: after my mother divorced, she left me alone at home with my ninety-four-year-old grandfather. I was twelve or thirteen and she went to live with her boyfriend, leaving me at my grandfather's house.

  4. 200415 years

    Sudden death of her mother

    And even more so-- and on top of that, for me the biggest blow of my life is that my mother died. I love my mum. I love my mum and, and, and she died when I was fifteen, just when I was beginning to, to realise everything.

  5. 200920 years

    Stopping cannabis use on medical advice

    And I sought support from my family and they did not help me. I asked them please to... And I also asked the psychologist I was seeing at the time; I spoke to her and she said to me: "Bueno, pues hacemos una se-- si para ti es tan importante, hacemos una sesión familiar y lo hablamos aquí". And all I was asking was not for them to stop smoking cannabis, but please not to smoke at home, because of course, smelling it and being around it all day and seeing the marijuana there and the hashish there, well fuck, it... [resopla] Nobody took even the smallest step to help me.

  6. 201829 years

    Transfer of the family business (tobacconist's) and last severe psychosomatic crisis

    The last one was because of the transfer of the family business. It was transferred, because of course, I have analysed myself a lot, because of course, I cannot afford to pay so many psychologists. [ríe] So I have analysed myself a lot.

  7. 202233 years

    Death of her father

    With my father I regret-- well, my father really screwed me over because I had to forgive him without being able to say it, because he was dying last year. My father got pancreatic cancer, which is fucking awful.

10 · patient memory

The patient's memory, after this session.

After each approved session, nexmin updates the patient's memory: recurring themes, detected patterns, ongoing therapeutic goals and risk level. Here you can read the memory generated after this first session.

In this first meeting, the consultant shows adequate receptiveness and a collaborative bond, enabling a deep exploration of her relational and somatic biography. Marked reflective awareness is observed regarding the origin of her bodily symptoms and people-pleasing patterns, although a block in everyday agency persists, driven by anticipatory fear of relapsing into episodes of immobilisation. The mapping scores reflect solid initial participation, with areas for development in autonomy and direct emotional processing in the face of relational overload.

11 · transcript

the complete transcript.

Complete transcript, with its 531 turns and original timestamps.

531 turns · 00:00:00 01:34:38

  1. Therapist

    00:00:00

    [melodía suave de piano] Hola, buenos días, [nombre].

  2. Client

    00:00:08

    Buenos días.

  3. Therapist

    00:00:10

    [Presentación y referencia a la procedencia omitidas.] O sea que, si te parece, pues podemos empezar. La primera cosa es: ¿qué tal, cómo estás? [ríe]

  4. Client

    00:00:37

    Bien, muy nerviosa, pero bien. [ríe]

  5. Therapist

    00:00:40

    Bueno, eso de nerviosa es normal. Eh, en principio, a ti, ¿hay alguna cosa en tu vida, en tu experiencia que, que te preocupe, que te limite-

  6. Client

    00:00:54

    Sí.

  7. Therapist

    00:00:54

    ...que te haga sentir mal a veces?

  8. Client

    00:00:57

    Siempre. Bueno, yo soy psicosomática, tengo una enfermedad psicosomática-

12 · session approval

When the therapist approves, the session closes.

The blocks on this page are saved as drafts pending review. By approving them, the therapist closes the session: nexmin then generates its identifying title and summary, updates the patient record when new information warrants it, and updates the memory used in subsequent assistant queries. The summary below was generated for this session.

if you want to try it

this same analysis, with your own sessions.

Explore the analysis of your own sessions with a 14-day free trial. No card required.

encrypted European infrastructure · audio can be deleted after analysis · models do not train on your material · drafts require your approval

how we handle data →